Stein v. Levine
This text of 8 A.D.2d 836 (Stein v. Levine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, and for medical expenses and loss of services, the appeal is from an order denying appellants’ motion for reconsideration on additional papers of their motion for a preference pursuant to rule 9 of the Kings County Supreme Court Trial Term Rules. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 A.D.2d 836, 190 N.Y.S.2d 622, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stein-v-levine-nyappdiv-1959.