Stein v. Kremer
This text of 112 N.Y.S. 1087 (Stein v. Kremer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
As alleged and as testified, the plaintiff having agreed with intending employers for a year, he and they jointly employed the defendants, counselors at law, to draw a contract for his employment for that period, and the contract, by one of them drawn and which the plaintiff as to his part paid for and on advice signed, was, as ruled by this court on a former appeal, a contract determinable at will. Upon such allegations, testimony, and determination, the complaint might not be, as it was, dismissed when the plaintiff rested.
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
112 N.Y.S. 1087, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stein-v-kremer-nyappterm-1908.