Stein v. Fray
This text of Stein v. Fray (Stein v. Fray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
ARLO STEIN,1 § § No. 224, 2020 Respondent Below, § Appellant, § § v. § Court Below–Family Court § of the State of Delaware SHARON FRAY, § § File No. CN08-01102 Petitioner Below, § Petition No. 19-31363 Appellee. § §
Submitted: January 8, 2021 Decided: February 15, 2021
Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and MONTGOMERY-REEVES, Justices.
ORDER
After careful consideration of the parties’ briefs and the Family Court record,
we find it evident that the judgment of the Family Court should be affirmed on the
basis of and for the reasons assigned in its June 5, 2020 order. As was appropriate
given the age and maturity of the sixteen-year-old child involved, the Family Court
gave great weight to his wishes when it considered the best-interests factors under
13 Del. C. § 722 and awarded guardianship of the child to the child’s paternal
grandmother.
1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties under Supreme Court Rule 7(d). NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the
Family Court is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Chief Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stein v. Fray, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stein-v-fray-del-2021.