Stein v. Brooklyn Ash Can Mfg. Co.
121 N.Y.S. 1148
Opinion
Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed, and the complaint dismissed, with costs, upon the ground that the evidence conclusively establishes that the contract was with Solomon Redlich personally, and not with the defendant. See Spencer v. Huntington, 100 App. Div. 463, 91 N. Y. Supp. 561, affirmed on opinion below 183 N. Y. 506, 76 N. E. 1109.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stein v. Brooklyn Ash Can Mfg. Co., 121 N.Y.S. 1148 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).
121 N.Y.S. 1148 (Stein v. Brooklyn Ash Can Mfg. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Spencer v. Huntington
100 A.D. 463 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)