Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Stein v. Brooklyn Ash Can Manufacturing Co.

Stein v. Brooklyn Ash Can Manufacturing Co.

137 A.D. 896
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1910
StatusPublished

This text of 137 A.D. 896 (Stein v. Brooklyn Ash Can Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stein v. Brooklyn Ash Can Manufacturing Co., 137 A.D. 896 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

Opinion

Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed, and the complaint dismissed, with, costs, upon the .ground that the evidence conclusively establishes that the contract was with Solomon Redlicli personally, and not with the defendant. (See Spencer v. Huntington, 100 App. Div. 463; affd. on opinion below, 183 N. Y. 506.) Jenks, Burr, Thomas, Rich and Carr, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Spencer v. Huntington
100 A.D. 463 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 A.D. 896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stein-v-brooklyn-ash-can-manufacturing-co-nyappdiv-1910.