Stein v. Brooklyn Ash Can Manufacturing Co.

137 A.D. 896

Opinion

Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed, and the complaint dismissed, with, costs, upon the .ground that the evidence conclusively establishes that the contract was with Solomon Redlicli personally, and not with the defendant. (See Spencer v. Huntington, 100 App. Div. 463; affd. on opinion below, 183 N. Y. 506.) Jenks, Burr, Thomas, Rich and Carr, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stein v. Brooklyn Ash Can Manufacturing Co., 137 A.D. 896 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

137 A.D. 896 (Stein v. Brooklyn Ash Can Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Spencer v. Huntington
100 A.D. 463 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)