Stein v. Arjay Machine Co.

88 Pa. D. & C. 92, 1954 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 285
CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
DecidedJune 1, 1954
Docketno. 6028
StatusPublished

This text of 88 Pa. D. & C. 92 (Stein v. Arjay Machine Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stein v. Arjay Machine Co., 88 Pa. D. & C. 92, 1954 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 285 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1954).

Opinion

Alessandroni, J.,

— Plaintiff filed a petition for discovery under Pa. R. C. P. 4009. The petition was granted.

Defendant filed exceptions to the order.

We can find no warrant of authority for the exceptions to the order of the court. The order for discovery is not a decree or finding of the court.

Therefore we cannot consider the exceptions or the merits thereof. See Mackowain v. Gulf Oil Corporation, 369 Pa. 581. The rules of court must be observed and complied with strictly.

Order

And now, to wit, June 1, 1954, defendant’s exceptions to the order of the court are dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MacKowain v. Gulf Oil Corp.
87 A.2d 314 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 Pa. D. & C. 92, 1954 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stein-v-arjay-machine-co-pactcomplphilad-1954.