Stein v. Arjay Machine Co.

88 Pa. D. & C. 92, 1954 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 285
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County·Decided June 1, 1954·No. no. 6028·Published

Opinion

Alessandroni, J.,

— Plaintiff filed a petition for discovery under Pa. R. C. P. 4009. The petition was granted.

Defendant filed exceptions to the order.

We can find no warrant of authority for the exceptions to the order of the court. The order for discovery is not a decree or finding of the court.

Therefore we cannot consider the exceptions or the merits thereof. See Mackowain v. Gulf Oil Corporation, 369 Pa. 581. The rules of court must be observed and complied with strictly.

Order

And now, to wit, June 1, 1954, defendant’s exceptions to the order of the court are dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stein v. Arjay Machine Co., 88 Pa. D. & C. 92, 1954 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 285 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1954).

88 Pa. D. & C. 92 (Stein v. Arjay Machine Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

MacKowain v. Gulf Oil Corp.
87 A.2d 314 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1952)