Stein Indus., Inc. v. United States

Court of International Trade

Stein Indus., Inc. v. United States

2019 CIT 75

CourtUnited States Court of International Trade

DecidedJune 18, 2019

Docket18-00150

StatusPublished

This text of 2019 CIT 75 (Stein Indus., Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of International Trade primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stein Indus., Inc. v. United States, 2019 CIT 75 (cit 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Slip Op. 19-75

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

STEIN INDUSTRIES INC., D/B/A CARLSON AIRFLO MERCHANDISING SYSTEMS,

Plaintiff, Before: Mark A. Barnett, Judge Court No. 18-00150 v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant.

JUDGMENT

This case having been submitted for decision, and the court, after due

deliberation, having rendered an opinion; now, in conformity with that opinion it is

hereby

ORDERED that the Final Scope Ruling on the Antidumping and Countervailing

Duty Orders on Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from the People’s Republic of

China issued in response to Carlson AirFlo Merchandising Systems’ Scope Ruling

Request (ECF No. 12-4), as amended by the Final Results of Remand Redetermination

(ECF No. 30), is SUSTAINED, and it is further

ORDERED that the entries enjoined in this action, see Order for Statutory Inj.

Upon Consent (July 24, 2018), ECF No. 14, must be liquidated in accordance with the Court No. 18-00150 Page 2

final court decision, including all appeals, as provided for in Section 516A(e) of the Tariff

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(e) (2012).

/s/ Mark A. Barnett Mark A. Barnett, Judge

Dated: June 18, 2019 New York, New York

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI