Stein & Co. v. State Tax Board

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Stein & Co. v. State Tax Board

167 S.E. 330, 46 Ga. App. 239, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 8

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 7, 1933·No. 22298·Published

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

Under the rulings in Georgia Paper Stock Co. v. State Tax Board, 174 Ga. 816 (164 S. E. 197), and Norman v. Knight, 45 Ga. App. 760 (165 S. E. 899), the plaintiff in the instant case, who was seeking a refund of taxes paid under the Georgia sales-tax act of 1929, was a person preparing commodities for sale, and consequently was chargeable with one half of one mill tax under section 3 of that act. The trial judge erred in holding to the contrary.

Judgment reversed.

Stephens and Sutton, JJ., concur. Jones, Fuller, Bussell & Clapp, Hyman M. Morris, for plaintiffs. George M. Napier, attorney-general, T. B. Gress, L. S. Camp, C. N. Davie, J. F. Kemp, J. A. Smith, B. C. Norman, P. H. Doyal, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jenkins, P. J.

Under the rulings in Georgia Paper Stock Co. v. State Tax Board, 174 Ga. 816 (164 S. E. 197), and Norman v. Knight, 45 Ga. App. 760 (165 S. E. 899), the plaintiff in the instant case, who was seeking a refund of taxes paid under the Georgia sales-tax act of 1929, was a person preparing commodities for sale, and consequently was chargeable with one half of one mill tax under section 3 of that act. The trial judge erred in holding to the contrary.

Judgment reversed.

Stephens and Sutton, JJ., concur. Jones, Fuller, Bussell & Clapp, Hyman M. Morris, for plaintiffs. George M. Napier, attorney-general, T. B. Gress, L. S. Camp, C. N. Davie, J. F. Kemp, J. A. Smith, B. C. Norman, P. H. Doyal, for defendants.

Stein & Co. v. State Tax Board, 167 S.E. 330, 46 Ga. App. 239, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 8 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

167 S.E. 330 (Stein & Co. v. State Tax Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related