Stein Co. v. Gross

14 Pa. D. & C. 126, 1930 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 457
CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County
DecidedMarch 7, 1930
DocketNo. 1266
StatusPublished

This text of 14 Pa. D. & C. 126 (Stein Co. v. Gross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stein Co. v. Gross, 14 Pa. D. & C. 126, 1930 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 457 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1930).

Opinion

Newcomb, P. J.,

Assumpsit for the price of sundry merchandise.

While the above caption is that of the statement, the plaintiff is named in three different ways on the record. It is impossible to say whether it is a corporation, a copartnership or an individual doing business under an assumed name. The defect is one of form rather than substance. Hence, it can be dealt with now only by treating this affidavit as a motion to strike off.

As such, the motion is allowed and the statement will be stricken off at the end of fifteen days unless a more specific statement shall have been filed in the meantime showing the identity of plaintiff.

From William A. Wilcox, Scranton, Pa.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 Pa. D. & C. 126, 1930 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stein-co-v-gross-pactcompllackaw-1930.