Steimer v. Boise Cascade Corp.
675 P.2d 517, 67 Or. App. 11, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 2810
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided February 15, 1984·No. 81-08623; CA A28143·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Reversed and remanded to the Board to determine under ORS 656.295(5) whether the case should be remanded to the referee, because it has been “improperly, incompletely or otherwise insufficiently developed or heard by the referee.” Bailey v. SAIF, 296 Or 41, 672 P2d 333 (1983).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Steimer v. Boise Cascade Corp., 675 P.2d 517, 67 Or. App. 11, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 2810 (Or. Ct. App. 1984).
675 P.2d 517 (Steimer v. Boise Cascade Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hemmert Agricultural Aviation, Inc. v. Mid-Continent Aircraft Corp.
663 F. Supp. 1546 (D. Kansas, 1987)
Wright v. Hinnenkamp
687 P.2d 163 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1984)