Steils v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Steils v. State

1912 OK CR 90, 120 P. 1133, 6 Okla. Crim. 732, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 347

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 23, 1912

DocketNo. A-1444.

StatusPublished

This text of 1912 OK CR 90 (Steils v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Steils v. State, 1912 OK CR 90, 120 P. 1133, 6 Okla. Crim. 732, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 347 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Henry .Steils, plaintiff in error, was convicted in the county court of Blaine county of the offense of maintaining a place where intoxicating liquors were received and kept for the purpose of selling, bartering-, giving away or otherwise furnishing said liquors. Upon a trial the jury returned a verdict of guilty and assessed his punishment at a term of six months in the county jail and to j>ay a fine of five hundred dollars. July 20, 1911, judgment and sentence was entered in accordance with the verdict of the jury. An examination of the record convinces us that the various assignments of error are without merit. The information sufficiently charges the offense, and there seem to be no reasonable doubt that the verdict of the jury was entirely in harmony with the interests of justice. The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed. Mandate to issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Henry .Steils, plaintiff in error, was convicted in the county court of Blaine county of the offense of maintaining a place where intoxicating liquors were received and kept for the purpose of selling, bartering-, giving away or otherwise furnishing said liquors. Upon a trial the jury returned a verdict of guilty and assessed his punishment at a term of six months in the county jail and to j>ay a fine of five hundred dollars. July 20, 1911, judgment and sentence was entered in accordance with the verdict of the jury. An examination of the record convinces us that the various assignments of error are without merit. The information sufficiently charges the offense, and there seem to be no reasonable doubt that the verdict of the jury was entirely in harmony with the interests of justice. The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed. Mandate to issue forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK CR 90, 120 P. 1133, 6 Okla. Crim. 732, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steils-v-state-oklacrimapp-1912.