Steil v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Steil v. State

1912 OK CR 342, 123 P. 1134, 7 Okla. Crim. 739, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 198

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 8, 1912

DocketNo. A-1-1

StatusPublished

This text of 1912 OK CR 342 (Steil v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Steil v. State, 1912 OK CR 342, 123 P. 1134, 7 Okla. Crim. 739, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 198 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

On the 31st day of December, 1910, judgment was rendered against appellant for a violation of the prohibitory liquor law and his punishment was assessed at a fine of one hundred dollars and thirty days' confinement in the county jail. No time was fixed by the trial court in its judgment within which the case-made was to be served. After the thirty days provided by law for serving a case-made had expired, the trial court attempted to extend the time for serving the case-made, but this cannot legally be done. The case-made was not served until the 4th day of March, and as no legal order was made extending the time within which the case-made should be served beyond the thirty days allowed by law, the case-made must be stricken from the record. We find no error in the record. The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On the 31st day of December, 1910, judgment was rendered against appellant for a violation of the prohibitory liquor law and his punishment was assessed at a fine of one hundred dollars and thirty days' confinement in the county jail. No time was fixed by the trial court in its judgment within which the case-made was to be served. After the thirty days provided by law for serving a case-made had expired, the trial court attempted to extend the time for serving the case-made, but this cannot legally be done. The case-made was not served until the 4th day of March, and as no legal order was made extending the time within which the case-made should be served beyond the thirty days allowed by law, the case-made must be stricken from the record. We find no error in the record. The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK CR 342, 123 P. 1134, 7 Okla. Crim. 739, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steil-v-state-oklacrimapp-1912.