Steigman v. Leviathan Holding Co.
This text of 245 A.D. 839 (Steigman v. Leviathan Holding Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action upon a contract for services, order denying defendant’s motion for leave to serve an amended answer reversed on the law and the facts, with ten doUars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, upon condition that the date of issue remain the same; the proposed amended answer to be served within five days from the entry of the order herein. In our opinion, the discretion of the Special Term in denying the defendant’s motion for leave to serve an amended answer was not properly exercised. (Bendan Holding Corporations. Rodner, ante, p. 723.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, CarsweE and Scudder, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
245 A.D. 839, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steigman-v-leviathan-holding-co-nyappdiv-1935.