Steighley v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Steighley v. State

29 Ind. 312

DecidedMay 15, 1868

StatusPublished

This text of 29 Ind. 312 (Steighley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Steighley v. State, 29 Ind. 312 (Ind. 1868).

Pincite

Opinion

Elliott, J.

Information in the name- of the State, on the relation of the prosecuting attorney, against Frederick Steighley, to oust him from the office of councilman of a ward of the city of Laporte, charging him with having intruded into and usurped the same. The facts are, in every respect, similar to those in Druliner v. The State, ante, p. 308, and the judgment is affirmed, with costs, for the reasons given in that case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Elliott, J.

Information in the name- of the State, on the relation of the prosecuting attorney, against Frederick Steighley, to oust him from the office of councilman of a ward of the city of Laporte, charging him with having intruded into and usurped the same. The facts are, in every respect, similar to those in Druliner v. The State, ante, p. 308, and the judgment is affirmed, with costs, for the reasons given in that case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 Ind. 312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steighley-v-state-ind-1868.