Steigert v. Steigert

Connecticut Appellate Court

Steigert v. Steigert

667 A.2d 808, 39 Conn. App. 932, 1995 Conn. App. LEXIS 517

CourtConnecticut Appellate Court

DecidedDecember 12, 1995

Docket13612

StatusPublished

This text of 667 A.2d 808 (Steigert v. Steigert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Steigert v. Steigert, 667 A.2d 808, 39 Conn. App. 932, 1995 Conn. App. LEXIS 517 (Colo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals from a judgment denying a motion to open. Counsel for the defendant on appeal was trial counsel and this appeal can best be categorized as a valiant but futile effort to retry the case in this court. No novel principles of law or appellate procedures are involved and to discuss seriatim the defendant’s numerous claims would serve no good purpose. See Byrne v. Trice, 170 Conn. 442, 442-43, 365 A.2d 1063 (1976).

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals from a judgment denying a motion to open. Counsel for the defendant on appeal was trial counsel and this appeal can best be categorized as a valiant but futile effort to retry the case in this court. No novel principles of law or appellate procedures are involved and to discuss seriatim the defendant’s numerous claims would serve no good purpose. See Byrne v. Trice, 170 Conn. 442, 442-43, 365 A.2d 1063 (1976).

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

667 A.2d 808, 39 Conn. App. 932, 1995 Conn. App. LEXIS 517, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steigert-v-steigert-connappct-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack