Steigert v. Steigert
667 A.2d 808, 39 Conn. App. 932, 1995 Conn. App. LEXIS 517
Opinion
The defendant appeals from a judgment denying a motion to open. Counsel for the defendant on appeal was trial counsel and this appeal can best be categorized as a valiant but futile effort to retry the case in this court. No novel principles of law or appellate procedures are involved and to discuss seriatim the defendant’s numerous claims would serve no good purpose. See Byrne v. Trice, 170 Conn. 442, 442-43, 365 A.2d 1063 (1976).
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Steigert v. Steigert, 667 A.2d 808, 39 Conn. App. 932, 1995 Conn. App. LEXIS 517 (Colo. Ct. App. 1995).
667 A.2d 808 (Steigert v. Steigert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Byrne v. Trice
365 A.2d 1063 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1976)