Steiger v. Wozniak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Steiger v. Wozniak

72 A.D.2d 944, 422 N.Y.S.2d 228, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14755

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 16, 1979

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 72 A.D.2d 944 (Steiger v. Wozniak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Steiger v. Wozniak, 72 A.D.2d 944, 422 N.Y.S.2d 228, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14755 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

&emdash;Judgment unanimously reversed, without costs, and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this article 78 proceeding to compel respondents to order the police officer who issued two traffic summonses to provide him with a supporting deposition pursuant to CPL 100.25 (subd 2). Respondents appeal from the judgment of Special Term which granted the petition. The judgment must be reversed and the petition dismissed. The summons in question was issued in the City of Buffalo, making article 2-A of the Vehicle and Traffic Law applicable (Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 225). The procedural requirements with respect to supporting depositions as provided by the Criminal Procedure Law are not applicable to summonses issued for traffic infractions under article 2-A of the Vehicle and Traffic Law (Matter of Sulli v Appeals Bd. of Admin. Adjudication Bur., 55 AD2d 457). (Appeal from judgment of Erie Supreme Court&emdash;art 78.) Present&emdash;-Simons, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Doerr and Moule, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

&emdash;Judgment unanimously reversed, without costs, and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this article 78 proceeding to compel respondents to order the police officer who issued two traffic summonses to provide him with a supporting deposition pursuant to CPL 100.25 (subd 2). Respondents appeal from the judgment of Special Term which granted the petition. The judgment must be reversed and the petition dismissed. The summons in question was issued in the City of Buffalo, making article 2-A of the Vehicle and Traffic Law applicable (Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 225). The procedural requirements with respect to supporting depositions as provided by the Criminal Procedure Law are not applicable to summonses issued for traffic infractions under article 2-A of the Vehicle and Traffic Law (Matter of Sulli v Appeals Bd. of Admin. Adjudication Bur., 55 AD2d 457). (Appeal from judgment of Erie Supreme Court&emdash;art 78.) Present&emdash;-Simons, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Doerr and Moule, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 A.D.2d 944, 422 N.Y.S.2d 228, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14755, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steiger-v-wozniak-nyappdiv-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack