Steiger v. London

52 Misc. 462, 102 N.Y.S. 497, 72 Misc. 462
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1907
StatusPublished

This text of 52 Misc. 462 (Steiger v. London) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steiger v. London, 52 Misc. 462, 102 N.Y.S. 497, 72 Misc. 462 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

Opinion

Gildersleeve, J.

This is an appeal by a lienor from an order overruling the said lienor’s objection to the jurisdiction of the City Court and approving an undertaking givbn to discharge a lien and directing the canceling of the lien. [463]*463The lien was for $7,300, and the amount of the undertaking $8,000. LTo action on the lien has been commenced. Section 315, subdivision 2, of the Code, gives the City Court-jurisdiction in an action to foreclose or enforce a lien for labor and materials upon real property, without specifying any monetary limitation. Section 3399, however, provides that a mechanic’s lien may be enforced by an action in a court which has jurisdiction in an action founded on a contract for a sum of money equivalent to the amount of such debt.” Section 316, subdivision 1, of the Code, provides that, in an action for a sum of money only, in the City Court, the amount of the judgment cannot exceed $2,000, exclusive of interest and costs, except where the action is brought on a bond or undertaking given in an action or special proceeding in the same court, or before a justice thereof, or for breach of promise of marriage, or where it is a marine cause referred to in section 317. The Code also limits’ the jurisdiction of the City Court to $2,000 in an action to recover chattels, or to foreclose a lien on chattels, or where judgment is entered on confession; but nowhere is any limit specifically fixed in an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, except as it is by section 3399, above quoted. The City Court is an inferior court, with no inherent powers, and depends entirely upon statutory permission in assuming jurisdiction; and the facts necessary to its jurisdiction will not be presumed, but must be made to appear affirmatively. 29 Mise. Rep. 283. The statute (Code, § 316) limits its jurisdiction, as we have seen, to $2,000 in an action for a sum. of money, which limit is extended inferentially to actions to enforce a mechanic’s lien by section 3399 of the Code; and nowhere is power conferred upon it to cancel a mechanic’s lien for a sum in excess of this statutory limit.

We conclude, therefore, that the court was without jurisdiction in making the order in question; which is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Blanchard and Dayton, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursemi

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 Misc. 462, 102 N.Y.S. 497, 72 Misc. 462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steiger-v-london-nyappterm-1907.