Stehley v. Irvin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Stehley v. Irvin

8 Pa. 500

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 15, 1848

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 8 Pa. 500 (Stehley v. Irvin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stehley v. Irvin, 8 Pa. 500 (Pa. 1848).

Pincite

Opinion

Burnside, J.

The hills of exception to evidence are not sustained. No rule of the law of evidence was violated. It would be a waste of time to discuss the bills in detail.

Nor are we able to discover that the error assigned to the charge is in a better situation. We think the court adopted the correct rule in estimating any damage Irvin sustained. It was certainly proper for the jury to regard the whole purchase.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burnside, J.

The hills of exception to evidence are not sustained. No rule of the law of evidence was violated. It would be a waste of time to discuss the bills in detail.

Nor are we able to discover that the error assigned to the charge is in a better situation. We think the court adopted the correct rule in estimating any damage Irvin sustained. It was certainly proper for the jury to regard the whole purchase.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 Pa. 500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stehley-v-irvin-pa-1848.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack