Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Stegmeier v. Weglarski

Stegmeier v. Weglarski

28 A.D.2d 1087, 285 N.Y.S.2d 287, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3139
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 31, 1967
StatusPublished

This text of 28 A.D.2d 1087 (Stegmeier v. Weglarski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stegmeier v. Weglarski, 28 A.D.2d 1087, 285 N.Y.S.2d 287, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3139 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Opinion

Memorandum: There was no negligence proved against defendant Smith. He, having found himself confronted with an emergency not of his own creation in whole or in part, exercised reasonable prudence and judgment under the circumstances. (Appeal from judgment of Erie Trial Term in automobile negligence action.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Henry and Del Yecchio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 A.D.2d 1087, 285 N.Y.S.2d 287, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stegmeier-v-weglarski-nyappdiv-1967.