Stegman v. Civil Service Commission of the State
189 A. 918, 117 N.J.L. 422, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 183
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Bodine, Heher, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 11.
For dismissal — Case, Perskie, JJ. 2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stegman v. Civil Service Commission of the State, 189 A. 918, 117 N.J.L. 422, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 183 (N.J. 1937).
189 A. 918 (Stegman v. Civil Service Commission of the State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.