Stegall v. State

185 S.E. 596, 53 Ga. App. 353, 1936 Ga. App. LEXIS 105
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 7, 1936·No. 25507·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MacIntyre, J.

The evidence, while conflicting, authorized the judge, trying the case without the intervention of a jury, to And the defendant guilty of operating a motor vehicle on a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquors. The court, did not err in overruling the motion for new trial, which contained the general grounds only. Austin v. State, 47 Ga. App. 191 (170 S. E. 86) ; Cavender v. State, 46 Ga. App. 782 (169 S. E. 253); Durham, v. State, 166 Ga. 561 (144 S. E. 109). Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Guerry, J., concur. J. A. Drake, G. A. Drake, for plaintiff in error. M. D. O’Neal, solicilor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stegall v. State, 185 S.E. 596, 53 Ga. App. 353, 1936 Ga. App. LEXIS 105 (Ga. Ct. App. 1936).

185 S.E. 596 (Stegall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harper v. State
86 S.E.2d 7 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)