Stegall v. SS Kresge Company

197 S.E.2d 737, 128 Ga. App. 679, 1973 Ga. App. LEXIS 1575
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 3, 1973·No. 47750·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Bell, Chief Judge.

A complaint should not be dismissed unless the averments disclose with certainty that the plaintiff would not be entitled to relief under any state of facts which could be proved in support of the claim. Harper v. DeFreitas, 117 Ga. App. 236 (1) (160 SE2d 260). Plaintiffs complaint alleges a claim for wrongful discharge from employment. Defendant’s motion to dismiss was granted. The defendant asserts the correct legal principle that a contract of employment for an indefinite period may be terminated at will by either party (Code § 66-101). However, the complaint does not affirmatively show that the contract of employment was for an indefinite period. The trial court erred in sustaining the motion to dismiss.

Judgment reversed.

Deen and Quillian, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stegall v. SS Kresge Company, 197 S.E.2d 737, 128 Ga. App. 679, 1973 Ga. App. LEXIS 1575 (Ga. Ct. App. 1973).

197 S.E.2d 737 (Stegall v. SS Kresge Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dittler Brothers, Inc. v. Amr International, Inc.
236 S.E.2d 544 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)
McClure v. Leasco Computer, Inc.
216 S.E.2d 689 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)
Furlow v. Fuqua Industries, Inc.
205 S.E.2d 717 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)