Stegall v. Auxt
This text of 693 So. 2d 788 (Stegall v. Auxt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re Auxt, Ericksson; Auxt, Erik A.; Auxt, Flynn; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “I”, Nos. 416,821, 414,848; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW96 2078.
Granted. Judgment of the trial court ordering production of the statement is reversed and set aside. Plaintiff failed to show that denial of production or inspection will unfairly prejudice him in preparing his claim or defense or will cause him undue hardship or injustice. La.Code Civ.P. art. 1424; cf. Ogea v. Jacobs, 344 So.2d 953 (La.1977). Case remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
693 So. 2d 788, 1997 La. LEXIS 1569, 1997 WL 267567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stegall-v-auxt-la-1997.