Steffler v. Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians
This text of 94 F. App'x 659 (Steffler v. Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Scott Brian Steffler appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 25 U.S.C. § 1303 petition for lack of jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
Steffler contends that the district court erred by dismissing his petition for lack of jurisdiction because the Cow Creek Band Board of Directors unlawfully caused him to be subjected to Oregon state criminal proceedings. We are not persuaded.
A person must be detained in some way by tribal authority to invoke subject matter jurisdiction under 25 U.S.C. § 1303. Moore v. Nelson, 270 F.3d 789, 790 (9th Cir.2001). Because Steffler was detained only by Oregon state authorities, and because the record does not reveal that the tribe acted in any way to cause the detention, we conclude that the district court did not err in dismissing Steffler’s petition for lack of jurisdiction.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not he cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
94 F. App'x 659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steffler-v-cow-creek-band-of-umpqua-tribe-of-indians-ca9-2004.