Steffey v. Standard Stations, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Steffey v. Standard Stations, Inc.

131 Cal. App. 202

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedApril 13, 1933

DocketCiv. No. 1253

StatusPublished

This text of 131 Cal. App. 202 (Steffey v. Standard Stations, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Steffey v. Standard Stations, Inc., 131 Cal. App. 202 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

BARNARD, P. J.

From the certificate of the county clerk on file herein it appears that notice of appeal was filed on January 21, 1933; that no bill of exceptions has been filed under section 650 of the Code of Civil Procedure; that no transcript has been filed under section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure; that no request for a transcript under the provisions of section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure has been filed; that no additional time in which to prepare and serve a bill of exceptions has been allowed; that no proceeding for a bill of exceptions or a transcript is pending in the trial court; and that the time within which a record might be prepared under either method has expired. Respondents’ motion to dismiss should, therefore, be granted (General Motors etc. Co. v. Holman, 63 Cal. App. 17 [217 Pac. 1086]; People v. Berkeley Chiropractic College, 103 Cal. App. 139 [283 Pac. 981] ; Union Trust Co. of San Diego v. Novotny, 125 Cal. App. 417 [13 Pac. (2d) 974]).

The appeal is dismissed.

Marks, J., and Jennings, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BARNARD, P. J.

From the certificate of the county clerk on file herein it appears that notice of appeal was filed on January 21, 1933; that no bill of exceptions has been filed under section 650 of the Code of Civil Procedure; that no transcript has been filed under section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure; that no request for a transcript under the provisions of section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure has been filed; that no additional time in which to prepare and serve a bill of exceptions has been allowed; that no proceeding for a bill of exceptions or a transcript is pending in the trial court; and that the time within which a record might be prepared under either method has expired. Respondents’ motion to dismiss should, therefore, be granted (General Motors etc. Co. v. Holman, 63 Cal. App. 17 [217 Pac. 1086]; People v. Berkeley Chiropractic College, 103 Cal. App. 139 [283 Pac. 981] ; Union Trust Co. of San Diego v. Novotny, 125 Cal. App. 417 [13 Pac. (2d) 974]).

The appeal is dismissed.

Marks, J., and Jennings, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

131 Cal. App. 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steffey-v-standard-stations-inc-calctapp-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack