Steffen v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Steffen v. State

132 So. 3d 863, 2014 WL 982684, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3757

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 4, 2014

DocketNo. 4D14-154

StatusPublished

This text of 132 So. 3d 863 (Steffen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Steffen v. State, 132 So. 3d 863, 2014 WL 982684, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3757 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Steffen petitions this court for a writ of habeas corpus seeking to strike the additional condition of “house arrest” as a condition of his pretrial release. This term was added in response to the State’s motion for pretrial detention filed two months after the initial pretrial release terms were set. We grant the petition and quash the pretrial detention order as the record presented does not establish that new evidence or a change of circumstances was demonstrated to the court to justify a modification of the bail order entered at the first hearing. Bush v. State, 74 So.3d 130 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011); Goelz v. Bradshaw, 906 So.2d 1234 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); see also Saravia v. For Miami-Dade Cnty., 129 So.3d 1163 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014).

Petition granted; order quashed.

No motions for rehearing will be entertained. Mandate shall issue simultaneously with this opinion.

STEVENSON, CIKLIN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Steffen petitions this court for a writ of habeas corpus seeking to strike the additional condition of “house arrest” as a condition of his pretrial release. This term was added in response to the State’s motion for pretrial detention filed two months after the initial pretrial release terms were set. We grant the petition and quash the pretrial detention order as the record presented does not establish that new evidence or a change of circumstances was demonstrated to the court to justify a modification of the bail order entered at the first hearing. Bush v. State, 74 So.3d 130 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011); Goelz v. Bradshaw, 906 So.2d 1234 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); see also Saravia v. For Miami-Dade Cnty., 129 So.3d 1163 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014).

Petition granted; order quashed.

No motions for rehearing will be entertained. Mandate shall issue simultaneously with this opinion.

STEVENSON, CIKLIN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

132 So. 3d 863, 2014 WL 982684, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steffen-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack