Steffen v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

132 P. 978, 89 Kan. 796, 1913 Kan. LEXIS 126
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedJune 7, 1913
DocketNo. 18,220
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 132 P. 978 (Steffen v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steffen v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co., 132 P. 978, 89 Kan. 796, 1913 Kan. LEXIS 126 (kan 1913).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

The findings of the jury establish .beyond question that the deceased was guilty of contributory negligence. He failed to listen for approaching cars and engines when he was at a sufficient distance from the track to have stopped and avoided being struck. If he had looked northward alóng the track when he arrived within 5 or 6 feet of it he could have seen the tender of the engine or the red light thereon fifty or sixty feet away. The jury also find that if he had looked he could have seen the engine and tender when he was about 15 feet west of the track upon which they were approaching. They find that the only precaution he took for his safety just before he attempted to cross the tracks was in trying to run around [797]*797the engine. The only negligence found against the defendant was in exceeding the speed limit, and the finding is that the speed was 7 miles per hour.

Although the petition describes some of the alleged negligent acts as “willful, wanton and reckless,” there was no evidence that would have justified the g;v;ng of an instruction submitting the question of willfulness or wantonness to the jury. There was no claim below that such an issue was involved. In the absence of gross negligence amounting to wantonness, the contributory negligence of the deceased prevents a recovery, and the court properly set aside the general verdict and gave the defendant judgment on the special findings.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shirley v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.
298 S.W. 125 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 P. 978, 89 Kan. 796, 1913 Kan. LEXIS 126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steffen-v-atchison-topeka-santa-fe-railway-co-kan-1913.