Stefanoni v. Duncan

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Stefanoni v. Duncan

890 A.2d 573, 276 Conn. 934, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 576

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided December 22, 2005·No. SC 17585·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 92 Conn. App. 172 (AC 25844), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Whether the Appellate Court properly directed judgment for the plaintiffs to permit installation of a walkway, to permit the plaintiffs to wharf out in the defendant’s littoral rights area, and to measure the view restriction burdening the defendant’s property from the ground floor of the plaintiffs’ residence?”

*935 Decided December 22, 2005 Christopher Stefanoni, pro se, and Margaret Stefanoni, pro se, in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 92 Conn. App. 172 (AC 25844), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Whether the Appellate Court properly directed judgment for the plaintiffs to permit installation of a walkway, to permit the plaintiffs to wharf out in the defendant’s littoral rights area, and to measure the view restriction burdening the defendant’s property from the ground floor of the plaintiffs’ residence?”

*935 Decided December 22, 2005 Christopher Stefanoni, pro se, and Margaret Stefanoni, pro se, in opposition.

Stefanoni v. Duncan, 890 A.2d 573, 276 Conn. 934, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 576 (Colo. 2005).

Pincite

890 A.2d 573 (Stefanoni v. Duncan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related