Stefanoni v. Duncan

890 A.2d 573, 276 Conn. 934, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 576
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedDecember 22, 2005
DocketSC 17585
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 890 A.2d 573 (Stefanoni v. Duncan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stefanoni v. Duncan, 890 A.2d 573, 276 Conn. 934, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 576 (Colo. 2005).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 92 Conn. App. 172 (AC 25844), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Whether the Appellate Court properly directed judgment for the plaintiffs to permit installation of a walkway, to permit the plaintiffs to wharf out in the defendant’s littoral rights area, and to measure the view restriction burdening the defendant’s property from the ground floor of the plaintiffs’ residence?”

*935 Decided December 22, 2005 Christopher Stefanoni, pro se, and Margaret Stefanoni, pro se, in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Sanchez
890 A.2d 573 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
890 A.2d 573, 276 Conn. 934, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stefanoni-v-duncan-conn-2005.