Stefano v. Longo
This text of 115 A.D.2d 348 (Stefano v. Longo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Memorandum: Petitioners have appealed from an order that dismissed their petition for lack of personal jurisdiction over the respondent Tanoury. Tanoury is a necessary party because his election in the primary will be nullified if the petitioners succeed (CPLR 1001). We are confined in our review to the papers in the record and, based on those papers, we find that Special Term properly dismissed the petition for lack of jurisdiction. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Murphy, J.—Election Law.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Green, Pine and Schnepp, JJ. (Decided Oct. 11, 1985.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
115 A.D.2d 348, 495 N.Y.S.2d 817, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stefano-v-longo-nyappdiv-1985.