Stefanko v. Scottsdale Securities, Inc.

102 F. App'x 162
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedJune 17, 2004
DocketNo. 04-1328
StatusPublished

This text of 102 F. App'x 162 (Stefanko v. Scottsdale Securities, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stefanko v. Scottsdale Securities, Inc., 102 F. App'x 162 (Fed. Cir. 2004).

Opinion

ORDER

RADER, Circuit Judge.

Daniel Stefanko moves to transfer his appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Scottsdale Securities, Inc. has not responded.

[163]*163Stefanko filed an action in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, 2:03-CV-00417, to vacate an arbitration award concerning the liquidation of a margin account. The district court denied Stefanko’s motion to vacate the arbitration award and entered judgment. Stefanko appealed and stated, in the notice of appeal, that he sought review by this court. In his motion to transfer, Stefanko states that the identification of this court was a “scrivener’s error.” We agree that we do not have jurisdiction over this appeal and that transfer, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631, is appropriate.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

Stefanko’s motion to transfer is granted. This appeal is transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 F. App'x 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stefanko-v-scottsdale-securities-inc-cafc-2004.