Stefaniak v. Kolipinski Bros.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stefaniak v. Kolipinski Bros.

261 A.D. 885, 25 N.Y.S.2d 1021

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 17, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 261 A.D. 885 (Stefaniak v. Kolipinski Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stefaniak v. Kolipinski Bros., 261 A.D. 885, 25 N.Y.S.2d 1021 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. Memorandum: On the record before us, without the aid of the oral explanation of the parties, we are unable to determine whether plaintiff’s account is or is not correct but we affirm the order in the interest of justice. All concur. (The order grants defendants’ motion for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence in an action to recover for services performed.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. Memorandum: On the record before us, without the aid of the oral explanation of the parties, we are unable to determine whether plaintiff’s account is or is not correct but we affirm the order in the interest of justice. All concur. (The order grants defendants’ motion for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence in an action to recover for services performed.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 A.D. 885, 25 N.Y.S.2d 1021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stefaniak-v-kolipinski-bros-nyappdiv-1941.