Stefaniak v. Kolipinski Bros.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stefaniak v. Kolipinski Bros.

261 A.D. 885, 25 N.Y.S.2d 1021

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 17, 1941·Published

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. Memorandum: On the record before us, without the aid of the oral explanation of the parties, we are unable to determine whether plaintiff’s account is or is not correct but we affirm the order in the interest of justice. All concur. (The order grants defendants’ motion for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence in an action to recover for services performed.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. Memorandum: On the record before us, without the aid of the oral explanation of the parties, we are unable to determine whether plaintiff’s account is or is not correct but we affirm the order in the interest of justice. All concur. (The order grants defendants’ motion for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence in an action to recover for services performed.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Stefaniak v. Kolipinski Bros., 261 A.D. 885, 25 N.Y.S.2d 1021 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

261 A.D. 885 (Stefaniak v. Kolipinski Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.