Steeves v. United States
This text of 234 F. App'x 102 (Steeves v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Robert F. Steeves appeals the district court’s order granting the Appellees’ motion to dismiss his civil complaint in which he alleged numerous workplace violations by current and former employees of the Food and Drug Administration. The district court found it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Steeves’s claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Steeves v. United States, No. 3:05-cv-00043, 2006 WL 3526911 (W.D.Va., Dec. 6, 2006). We deny Steeves’s motion to strike the Appellees’ informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
234 F. App'x 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steeves-v-united-states-ca4-2007.