Steevens & Waters v. Clancey

New York Supreme Court

Steevens & Waters v. Clancey

1 Johns. 521

DecidedAugust 15, 1806

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Johns. 521 (Steevens & Waters v. Clancey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Steevens & Waters v. Clancey, 1 Johns. 521 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1806).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The bail-bond was sufficiently descriptive and certain, as to the court and place of the defendant’s appearance. The law only requires, that they should be substantially set forth in the bail-bond.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The bail-bond was sufficiently descriptive and certain, as to the court and place of the defendant’s appearance. The law only requires, that they should be substantially set forth in the bail-bond.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Johns. 521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steevens-waters-v-clancey-nysupct-1806.