Steeprow Enterprises, Inc. v. Monier Roof Tile, Inc.

644 So. 2d 168, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10378, 1994 WL 583768
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 26, 1994·No. No. 93-2719·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. As to Steeprow Enterprises, Inc., see Latour Auto Sales, Inc. v. Stromberg-Carlson Leasing Corp., 385 So.2d 600 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). As to the individual defendants, not only were their pleadings and affidavits deficient, even if we construe them as an attempt to raise affirmative defenses, they failed to state a viable defense. See Institutional & Supermarket Equip., Inc. v. C & S Refrigeration, Inc., 609 So.2d 66 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Kerr-McGee Chemical Corp. v. CHB Farms, Inc., 340 So.2d 483 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).

DELL, C.J., and HERSEY and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Steeprow Enterprises, Inc. v. Monier Roof Tile, Inc., 644 So. 2d 168, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10378, 1994 WL 583768 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

644 So. 2d 168 (Steeprow Enterprises, Inc. v. Monier Roof Tile, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nathaniel v. City of Moss Point
385 So. 2d 599 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1980)
KERR-McGEE CHEMICAL CORP v. CHB Farms, Inc.
340 So. 2d 483 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Inst. & Supermarket Equip. v. C & S
609 So. 2d 66 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)