Steenburg v. Phifer

68 So. 449, 69 Fla. 517
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedApril 27, 1915
StatusPublished

This text of 68 So. 449 (Steenburg v. Phifer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steenburg v. Phifer, 68 So. 449, 69 Fla. 517 (Fla. 1915).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

This cause having been submitted to the court at a former term thereof, upon the transcript of the record of the appeal aforesaid, and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said decree; it is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed; it is further ordered that the appellee do have and recover of and from the appellants his costs bj [518]*518him in this behalf expended, which costs are taxed at the sum of.........., all of which is ordered to be certified to the court below.

Appeal from Circuit Court for Alachua County; Jas. T. Wills, Judge.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Phifer v. Steenburg
66 Fla. 555 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 So. 449, 69 Fla. 517, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steenburg-v-phifer-fla-1915.