Steenbar v. Charles Buerman & Co.

138 N.E.2d 745, 2 N.Y.2d 751, 157 N.Y.S.2d 387, 1956 N.Y. LEXIS 694
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 18, 1956
StatusPublished

This text of 138 N.E.2d 745 (Steenbar v. Charles Buerman & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steenbar v. Charles Buerman & Co., 138 N.E.2d 745, 2 N.Y.2d 751, 157 N.Y.S.2d 387, 1956 N.Y. LEXIS 694 (N.Y. 1956).

Opinion

Motion for leave to prosecute appeal as a poor person and for assignment of counsel granted and Messrs. Max Jackrel and Norman Bard of 66 Court Street, Brooklyn, New York, assigned as counsel to appellant on the appeal herein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 N.E.2d 745, 2 N.Y.2d 751, 157 N.Y.S.2d 387, 1956 N.Y. LEXIS 694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steenbar-v-charles-buerman-co-ny-1956.