Steen v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Steen v. State

1912 OK CR 82, 120 P. 1133, 6 Okla. Crim. 727, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 348

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Steen v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 4 Okla. Crim. 309 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided January 23, 1912·No. No. A-1109.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Walter Steen, was convicted in the county court of Tulsa county at the March, 1911, term, on a charge of selling intoxicating liquor, and on the 3rd day of said month adjudged by the court in accordance with the verdict of the jury to pay a fine of five hundred dollars and be confined in the county jail for a period of ninety days. We have carefully examined the record and errors complained of, and find no errors sufficient to justify a reversal of this cause. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed!”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Walter Steen, was convicted in the county court of Tulsa county at the March, 1911, term, on a charge of selling intoxicating liquor, and on the 3rd day of said month adjudged by the court in accordance with the verdict of the jury to pay a fine of five hundred dollars and be confined in the county jail for a period of ninety days. We have carefully examined the record and errors complained of, and find no errors sufficient to justify a reversal of this cause. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed!”

Steen v. State, 1912 OK CR 82, 120 P. 1133, 6 Okla. Crim. 727, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 348 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

1912 OK CR 82 (Steen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.