Steen v. State
340 S.W.3d 346, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 568, 2011 WL 1542817
This text of 340 S.W.3d 346 (Steen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Steen v. State, 340 S.W.3d 346, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 568, 2011 WL 1542817 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
Opinion
ORDER
Johnathan Steen appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion alleging ineffective assistance of his trial counsel, following his conviction for first-degree assault. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment denying post-conviction relief.
AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Steele v. Steele
340 S.W.3d 346 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
340 S.W.3d 346, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 568, 2011 WL 1542817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steen-v-state-moctapp-2011.