Steen v. New Deal Delivery Service, Inc.

427 N.E.2d 770, 54 N.Y.2d 796, 443 N.Y.S.2d 611, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2714
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 17, 1981
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 427 N.E.2d 770 (Steen v. New Deal Delivery Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steen v. New Deal Delivery Service, Inc., 427 N.E.2d 770, 54 N.Y.2d 796, 443 N.Y.S.2d 611, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2714 (N.Y. 1981).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On summary consideration, order affirmed, with costs. It cannot be said, as a matter of law, that the Appellate [798]*798Division abused its discretion in dismissing the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3012 (subd [b j). As we held in Barasch v Micucci (49 NY2d 594, 600-601), it would have constituted an abuse of discretion to have failed to dismiss.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Manhattan King David Restaurant, Inc. v. Nathanson
269 A.D.2d 297 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Migliaccio v. Phoenix Insurance
91 A.D.2d 821 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Eaton v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States, Inc.
438 N.E.2d 1119 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
427 N.E.2d 770, 54 N.Y.2d 796, 443 N.Y.S.2d 611, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steen-v-new-deal-delivery-service-inc-ny-1981.