Steen v. New Deal Delivery Service, Inc.
This text of 427 N.E.2d 770 (Steen v. New Deal Delivery Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On summary consideration, order affirmed, with costs. It cannot be said, as a matter of law, that the Appellate [798]*798Division abused its discretion in dismissing the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3012 (subd [b j). As we held in Barasch v Micucci (49 NY2d 594, 600-601), it would have constituted an abuse of discretion to have failed to dismiss.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
427 N.E.2d 770, 54 N.Y.2d 796, 443 N.Y.S.2d 611, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steen-v-new-deal-delivery-service-inc-ny-1981.