Steelton Borough v. Booser

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Steelton Borough v. Booser

29 A. 654, 162 Pa. 630, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 1033

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 11, 1894

DocketAppeal, No. 33

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 29 A. 654 (Steelton Borough v. Booser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Steelton Borough v. Booser, 29 A. 654, 162 Pa. 630, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 1033 (Pa. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Trial by jury having been waived, this case was submitted to the court below under the provisions of the act of April 22, 1874.

[638]*638The record contains a clear and concise statement of the facts found by the learned trial judge together with the legal conclusions drawn by him therefrom. The questions presented have been so fully considered and so satisfactorily disposed of that further discussion of any of them is unnecessary. The judgment in favor of the defendant is therefore affirmed.

Judgment affirmed on the opinion of the court below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

Trial by jury having been waived, this case was submitted to the court below under the provisions of the act of April 22, 1874.

[638]*638The record contains a clear and concise statement of the facts found by the learned trial judge together with the legal conclusions drawn by him therefrom. The questions presented have been so fully considered and so satisfactorily disposed of that further discussion of any of them is unnecessary. The judgment in favor of the defendant is therefore affirmed.

Judgment affirmed on the opinion of the court below.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 A. 654, 162 Pa. 630, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 1033, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steelton-borough-v-booser-pa-1894.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack