Steelmasters, Inc. v. Household Manufacturing Co.
This text of 40 A.D.2d 963 (Steelmasters, Inc. v. Household Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered June 5, 1972, unanimously reversed, on the law, defendant-appellant’s motion to dismiss the fifth to eighth causes of the complaint, inclusive, granted, and the complaint dismissed and the action severed as to him. Appellant shall recover of respondent $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal. The simple question is whether the record supports plaintiff’s claim that the goods in issue, for which recovery is sought, were sold to defendant individually or to the defendant corporation only. All of the documentary evidence — invoices, letters, purchase orders, even plaintiff’s ledger sheet — indicates that plaintiff dealt with the corporation, not the individual. Even an unsigned draft contract prepared by plaintiff supports this view. Appellant’s signatures on documents were signed in his official capacity. The mere private intention or secret belief of plaintiff is insufficient to overcome the documentary evidence or to create a triable issue. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Murphy, McNally and Steuer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
40 A.D.2d 963, 338 N.Y.S.2d 451, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steelmasters-inc-v-household-manufacturing-co-nyappdiv-1972.