Steelman v. Cox
3 N.J.L. 644
Opinion
— The judgment is erroneous; Andrew Steelman was not a party to the suit; judgment could not be rendered against him, any more than against an attorney on a verdict against his principal. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Steelman v. Cox, 3 N.J.L. 644 (N.J. 1810).
3 N.J.L. 644 (Steelman v. Cox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.