Steelman v. Cox
3 N.J.L. 644
This text of 3 N.J.L. 644 (Steelman v. Cox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Steelman v. Cox, 3 N.J.L. 644 (N.J. 1810).
Opinion
— The judgment is erroneous; Andrew Steelman was not a party to the suit; judgment could not be rendered against him, any more than against an attorney on a verdict against his principal. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 N.J.L. 644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steelman-v-cox-nj-1810.