Steelman v. Ackley

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Steelman v. Ackley

2 N.J.L. 165

DecidedFebruary 15, 1807

StatusPublished

This text of 2 N.J.L. 165 (Steelman v. Ackley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Steelman v. Ackley, 2 N.J.L. 165 (N.J. 1807).

Pincite

Opinion

Kirkpatrick, C. J.

— Ackley had recovered a judgment against Steelman, upon which he was taken in execution and committed to Gloucester jail. Being in custody, Steelman gave bond and security for the privilege of the limits. This bond became forfeited by a breach of the condition, and was assigned by the sheriff to Ackley; upon this bond, this suit was brought, and a judgment entered. After the entry of this judgment, the original judgment is reversed in the Supreme Court. I think this judgment must go with it.¹

Rossell and Pennington, Justices. — Concurred.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kirkpatrick, C. J.

— Ackley had recovered a judgment against Steelman, upon which he was taken in execution and committed to Gloucester jail. Being in custody, Steelman gave bond and security for the privilege of the limits. This bond became forfeited by a breach of the condition, and was assigned by the sheriff to Ackley; upon this bond, this suit was brought, and a judgment entered. After the entry of this judgment, the original judgment is reversed in the Supreme Court. I think this judgment must go with it.¹

Rossell and Pennington, Justices. — Concurred.

Judgment reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 N.J.L. 165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steelman-v-ackley-nj-1807.