Steele v. United States
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
BLUEFIELD DIVISION LACOSTA STEELE
Movant, Case No. 1:22-cv-00444 v. Case No. 1:21-cr-00187-02
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SEALING EXHIBITS
Movant has filed documentation attaching exhibits in support of her Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence under Section 2255. (ECF No. 91). The Court notes that the attached exhibits contain Movant’s medical information. Due to the confidential nature of the personal health information contained in the exhibits, the Court ORDERS that the exhibits, (ECF No. 91-2), be sealed. The undersigned is cognizant of the well-established Fourth Circuit precedent recognizing a presumption in favor of public access to judicial records. Ashcraft v. Conoco, Inc., 218 F.3d 288 (4th Cir. 2000). As stated in Ashcraft, before sealing a document, the Court must follow a three-step process: (1) provide public notice of the request to seal; (2) consider less drastic alternatives to sealing the document; and (3) provide specific reasons and factual findings supporting its decision to seal the documents and for rejecting alternatives. Id. at 302. In this case, the attached exhibits shall be sealed and will be designated as sealed on the Court’s docket. The Court deems this sufficient notice to interested members of the public. The Court has considered less drastic alternatives to sealing the documents, but in view of the nature of the information set forth in the documents—which is information generally protected from public release— alternatives to wholesale sealing are not feasible at this time. Accordingly, the Court finds that sealing the exhibits does not unduly prejudice the public’s right to access court documents. Accordingly, the Clerk is DIRECTED to file the exhibits, (ECF No. 91-2) attached to Movant’s documentation in support of her Motion under Section 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence, under seal. The Clerk is instructed to provide a copy of this Order to Movant and counsel of record. ENTERED: February 24, 2023
Chey Eifert U Ce Magistrate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Steele v. United States (Steele v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.