Steele v. State
Opinion
Phillip Steele was found guilty of murder and burglary.1 He ap[861]*861peals, arguing that two incriminating statements which he gave to police should not have been admitted by the trial court. We affirm.
1. After reviewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the jury’s determination of guilt, we conclude that a rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty of the crimes for which he was convicted beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).
2. Steele’s remaining enumeration of error concerning the admissibility of custodial statements is without merit.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
452 S.E.2d 513 (Steele v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.