Steele v. State

452 S.E.2d 513, 264 Ga. 860, 95 Fulton County D. Rep. 345, 1995 Ga. LEXIS 47
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 30, 1995·No. S94A1194·Published

Opinion

Hunt, Chief Justice.

Phillip Steele was found guilty of murder and burglary.1 He ap[861]*861peals, arguing that two incriminating statements which he gave to police should not have been admitted by the trial court. We affirm.

Decided January 30, 1995. Reginald L. Bellury, for appellant. Joseph H. Briley,- District Attorney, James L. Cline, Assistant District Attorney, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, Susan V. Boleyn, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Michael D. Groves, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

1. After reviewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the jury’s determination of guilt, we conclude that a rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty of the crimes for which he was convicted beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).

2. Steele’s remaining enumeration of error concerning the admissibility of custodial statements is without merit.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Steele v. State, 452 S.E.2d 513, 264 Ga. 860, 95 Fulton County D. Rep. 345, 1995 Ga. LEXIS 47 (Ga. 1995).

452 S.E.2d 513 (Steele v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jackson v. Virginia
443 U.S. 307 (Supreme Court, 1979)