Steele v. State

925 So. 2d 475, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5669, 2006 WL 1006401
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 19, 2006·No. No. 4D06-155·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Steele appeals the summary denial of his rule 3.850 motion for postcon-viction relief. The trial court denied appellant’s 3.850 motion as untimely without ruling on the merits of appellant’s three claims. The appellant’s rule 3.850 motion was timely filed, as his judgment and sentence were not final until the thirty day period for filing an appeal expired. Napolitano v. State, 782 So.2d 1012 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Caracciolo v. State, 564 So.2d 1163 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). Accordingly, the trial court’s denial of these claims is reversed and remanded for an evidentiary hearing or record attachments that conclusively show appellant is not entitled to relief.

FARMER, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Steele v. State, 925 So. 2d 475, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5669, 2006 WL 1006401 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

925 So. 2d 475 (Steele v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Samuel v. State
925 So. 2d 475 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)