Steele v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Steele v. State

575 So. 2d 311, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1569, 1991 WL 24856

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 1, 1991

DocketNo. 90-00613

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 575 So. 2d 311 (Steele v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Steele v. State, 575 So. 2d 311, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1569, 1991 WL 24856 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the defendant’s numerous convictions and sentences.

We disagree with the defendant’s contention that his probationary split sentence of twelve years imprisonment followed by three years probation was improper. See Poore v. State, 531 So.2d 161 (Fla.1988).

In case number 89-276, we strike the fine imposed pursuant to section 775.0835, Florida Statutes (1987), because there was no showing of the statutory requirement that the offenses involved resulted in the injury or death to the victim.

Affirmed, as modified by this opinion.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and FRANK and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI