Steele v. Roberts
This text of 277 A.D.2d 945 (Steele v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the court erred in refusing to allow oral testimony to show that the deed was in fact intended to be a mortgage. Paragraph 6 of the complaint sufficiently states a cause of action to have the deed declared to be a mortgage. (See Pattison v. Pattison, 301 N. Y. 65.) All concur. (The order appealed from dismisses plaintiffs complaint and cancels the lis pendens, in an action to compel reconveyance.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Love, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
277 A.D.2d 945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steele-v-roberts-nyappdiv-1950.