Steele v. Richards

Oregon Supreme Court

Steele v. Richards

363 P.2d 60, 227 Or. 466, 1961 Ore. LEXIS 339

DecidedJune 28, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 363 P.2d 60 (Steele v. Richards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Steele v. Richards, 363 P.2d 60, 227 Or. 466, 1961 Ore. LEXIS 339 (Or. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

SLOAN, J.

This was an action to recover overtime pay as required by the Pair Labor Standards Act, 29 HSCA 201, et seq., and for double time pay for Sunday labor. Plaintiff recovered a judgment and defendants appeal. We have examined the record and authorities and find no merit in any of the assignments of error.

Judgment affirmed. Plaintiff is awarded his attorney’s fee for resisting the appeal in the sum of $350. Holtville Alfalfa Mills v. Wyatt, 230 F2d 398 (9th cir 1955).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SLOAN, J.

This was an action to recover overtime pay as required by the Pair Labor Standards Act, 29 HSCA 201, et seq., and for double time pay for Sunday labor. Plaintiff recovered a judgment and defendants appeal. We have examined the record and authorities and find no merit in any of the assignments of error.

Judgment affirmed. Plaintiff is awarded his attorney’s fee for resisting the appeal in the sum of $350. Holtville Alfalfa Mills v. Wyatt, 230 F2d 398 (9th cir 1955).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

363 P.2d 60, 227 Or. 466, 1961 Ore. LEXIS 339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steele-v-richards-or-1961.