Steele v. People

40 Ill. 59
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1867
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 40 Ill. 59 (Steele v. People) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steele v. People, 40 Ill. 59 (Ill. 1867).

Opinion

Per Curiam :

As a rule of practice, we will not entertain an application of this character after the' term at which the cause was submitted to the court for decision. If made during the term, however, we can entertain the motion, and, upon cause shown, will afford the party an opportunity of bringing up a correct transcript of the record. But we must regard this motion for a writ of certiorari, as including an application to set aside the submission and the joinder in error, as the present condition of the case in that regard is inconsistent with the character of relief sought.

The submission and the joinder irr error will be set aside, and a writ of certiorari awarded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Illinois Steel Co. v. Szutenbach
67 Ill. App. 280 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1896)
Stebbins v. Anthony
5 Colo. 342 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1880)
Martin v. Force
3 Colo. 199 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1877)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 Ill. 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steele-v-people-ill-1867.